@dijana wrote:
Hello @sabrinaeck and @asmecher,
I see that this topic was discussed before, here: http://forum.pkp.sfu.ca/t/ojs3-section-editor-acting-also-as-reviewer/25553
In OJS2 this situations were clear and well handled. Depending on the role (which could easily be seen in the breadcrumbs) software would allow appropriate workflow. In OJS3, if the editor accepts to review the article, and completes the reviewer's workflow, he/she stays stuck in reviewer role for this particular submission.
This can be worked around in the browser's address bar, by removing "reviewer" and typing "workflow" instead.
EDIT: Actually this does not seem to be a real workaround, as there is no way that the reviews can be "confirmed", so no way to really conclude the reviewing stage. If the reviews can not be confirmed, than they can not be imported into decision emails.
EDIT #2: The reviewing process may be continued without confirmed reviews.
Dijana
Posts: 5
Participants: 2